Minutes:
Cabinet Member Ben Callard and Jonathan Davies introduced the report and answered the members’ questions with Peter Davies, Matthew Gatehouse, Deb Hill-Howells, Craig O’ Connor, Will McLean and Jane Rodgers:
Officers responded that while bills currently link to detailed information online, they will consider producing a simpler hard copy version for future billing cycles.
Officers explained that while there are still some vacancies affecting income, recent new tenancies (especially in flexible office space) are positive, and active marketing continues. The remaining vacant space is more challenging to let, but overall tenancy levels are close to targets and existing tenants are expanding.
It was clarified that there are currently 733 vacant posts, but not all have associated budgets due to career development structures. Teams have vacancy factors built into budgets, and all vacancies outside schools require senior sign-off to ensure careful management. The council employs around 4,100 staff (headcount), with fewer full-time equivalents.
Castlegate’s roof structure is suitable and such installations are considered during maintenance, but at Newport Leisure Park, tenants are responsible for their own energy costs, so solar panels would not benefit the council directly.
Officers clarified that the overspend is mainly due to reduced penalty notice income, not pay-and-display, and recruitment is underway to restore enforcement capacity, aiming to resolve the issue. The total number of enforcement officers will be six after recruitment.
The Tour of Britain provides an economic impact report, which will be shared when available, though it might not detail impacts by specific area within Monmouthshire.
It was clarified that training uses part of the ground floor for courses, reducing costs by avoiding external venue hire, but the building still has other tenants and this is an interim solution.
The Cabinet Member and officers confirmed that assets like Innovation House are managed corporately within landlord services and reported under the broader resources portfolio.
Tenants are responsible for their own buildings and would need to weigh the lease length against installation costs, but the council can support tenants interested in renewables. Previous attempts to install and sell energy to tenants were not financially viable for the council. Action: Peter Davies to discuss with Nick Keyse and provide a written response back to the committee
It was explained that staffing levels are low compared to benchmarks, creating pressures, but the council actively monitors staff well-being and offers support through occupational health, informal groups, and training. The process of right-sizing is ongoing and continually monitored.
Staffing levels are based on council-set budgets and service demand, with adjustments made annually through budget pressures and savings. Not all service delivery is by directly employed staff, as some is outsourced, and staffing needs are continually reviewed using service intelligence and demand modelling.
A fully resourced enforcement team is being recruited, technology solutions are being explored, and there is a service agreement with another authority for debt recovery.
It was explained that schools often have insurance for supply cover, the council is exploring its own scheme, and advice is given to schools to insure against these costs.
Schools have shared use agreements with leisure centres, and while rental opportunities exist, there are limitations due to supervision and management requirements.
This point was acknowledged. The Member suggested reviewing insurance thresholds for supply cover to ensure schools benefit from their policies.
Officers responded that budget lines can change due to service transfers (e.g., housing and homelessness moving into social care), new policy initiatives from Welsh Government with additional funding, and increased demand for high-need care, especially post-pandemic. It was emphasised that the rise is due to a combination of new responsibilities, policy changes, and higher demand, not just inflation.
The contingency fund is being fully used for this purpose, and future mitigation will rely on financial discipline, maximising grant and income opportunities, and using capital receipts.
Increased complexity and longevity of care needs, demographic changes, and higher thresholds for health-funded care have led to more costly social care packages. There are ongoing discussions with health services about eligibility and funding boundaries.
Chair’s Summary:
Thank you to the Cabinet Members and officers for the report and their responses. The report was moved.
Supporting documents: