Cabinet Member Councillor Angela Sandles introduced the report,
explaining that the Equality Act 2010 requires the council to
produce a strategic equality plan and annual progress reports. She
advised that the current plan covered 2024–2028 and aligned
with the council’s corporate and community goals. Together
with Pennie Walker, she answered Members’
questions.
Key Questions and points raised by
Members:
- How
is the council is giving every child the best start in life when
the home to school transport policy adds barriers to school
attendance, especially for pre-school meal children who already
have lower attendance rates? I’m concerned that the council
is waiting to see the impact on children receiving free school
meals, rather than proactively addressing potential
barriers.
- How
the council can further include young people just above the free
school meal eligibility line, who are disadvantaged by the £2
daily charge for breakfast at King Henry School and may not be able
to afford it?
- Is
the council is liaising with the Women’s Institute in Gwent
regarding their "knot in my name" campaign against violence towards
women and girls?
- Are
there are plans to review drop kerbs at bus stops across the
county, noting that while improvements have been made in some
areas, issues remain elsewhere?
- Are
we planning to extend digital literacy training beyond hubs to
secondary settlements and the wider community, to reach those with
ongoing digital needs?
Pennie advised that due to the specific nature of the questions
asked that relate to responsibilities of various service areas, she
would need to seek answers to provide to the committee by email
(Action: Pennie Walker).
- The
protected characteristics under the Equality Act need updating. The
plan should use "sex" (biological sex) instead of "gender" in line
with the Supreme Court judgement, especially when referencing the
Equality Act.
- The
Welsh Government's LGBTQ+ action plan referenced in the report is
also not in keeping with legislation, following the Supreme Court
judgement. Policies should ensure compliance, especially regarding
the legal status of trans and non-binary identities. Policies
should ensure compliance, especially regarding the legal status of
trans and non-binary identities.
Pennie advised that the our Strategic
Equality Plan reflects the position for 2024-2025 which was prior
to the Supreme Court Judgement, so the plan was drafted correctly
for the time period it
reflects.
- Inclusive language" should mean avoiding inappropriate gendered
terms (e.g., using "chair" instead of
"chairman").
Penny acknowledged this and agreed to review and update the
language in the plan (Action: Pennie
Walker).
- Sex
as a characteristic should be included in "give every child the
best start in life," particularly in relation to LGBTQ+ education,
as the Equality Act is about sex and gender reassignment, not
gender ideology. I have concerns about puberty blockers and
safeguarding children.
- Why
is sex not listed as a relevant characteristic in Objective 1,
highlighting its importance for inclusion, menstruation, and health
issues?
- Please can we remove the tick for gender reassignment, as it is
not applicable to children.
Penny agreed this was an oversight and would add sex and remove
gender reassignment for the next
report.
- In
terms of what a "plus child" is in the context of LGBTQ+ inclusive
education, I have concerns about teaching children they need to
change their bodies if they don't fit gender
stereotypes.
- Period poverty should reference "young women and girls" as
menstruation only affects females, and de-sexing the language is
unhelpful.
- Sex
is not listed as a relevant characteristic in Objective 5,
emphasizing the need for sex-segregated spaces for safety and
accessibility, especially for women and minority faith
groups.
- I
have concerns that inclusive language in training materials can
erase women from issues that affect them, impacting understanding
and health outcomes, especially for those with learning
disabilities or for whom English is a second
language.
- What steps are being taken to ensure that external resources
used for LGBTQ+ education and relationships/sexuality education in
schools are safe and Lawful?
Penny said she would need to consult with the head of inclusion
and provide details following the meeting (Action: Pennie
Walker).
- How
is the council monitoring that equalities training for leaders and
managers is lawful and uses correct terminology, noting misuse of
"gender" instead of "sex."
Penny responded that they are waiting for EHRC guidance and will
review policies and the Strategic Equality Plan
accordingly.
- The
language in the plan is confusing, so please could "sex" be used
rather than "gender" throughout, including in references to the pay
gap.
Penny explained that Welsh Government require Councils to report
on the gender pay gap, so this is not something we are able to
change.
- The
plan should mention Christianity in relation to collective worship
in schools, as required by law.
- It
is important to protect women’s spaces (e.g., toilets,
changing rooms) and referenced previous council discussions about
single-sex toilets in new schools.
- Could the plan address conflicts between protected
characteristics, such as marriage or stable
relationships?
- Is
data on bullying, harassment and discrimination collected by
schools broken down by sex, specifically to understand peer-on-peer
assaults and the context of violence against women and
girls?
Penny agreed to assess what data is collected and to provide a
response (Action: Pennie
Walker).
- It’s positive to hear that the council has achieved
age-friendly employer status. What has been done to encourage the
workforce to stay in work longer, including reasonable adjustments
for older staff? Please can we have some further detail on this?
(Action: Pennie Walker).
- Please can the plan reference the Council's ambition to have at
least one "changing space" (changing places facility) in every
town, and that this be fully considered in relevant Council
decisions.
Penny acknowledged this point.
- Will the plan be updated earlier than scheduled, stressing the
importance for children’s education and
safeguarding?
Penny and Councillor Sandles acknowledged the feedback provided
by the Committee and reminded Members that the report refers to the
current period, and indicated they are awaiting EHRC guidance and
will review and update the plan as
needed.