Context:
We received the
Proposed Property Acquisition Policy, the purpose was for the
committee to conduct pre-decision
scrutiny of the proposed strategy for the acquisition of investment
properties.
Key Issues:
The
Council has undertaken a rationalisation programme of its
operational assets to reduce holding costs. Given the scale of the
budget cuts facing the Council during the MTFP, cutting costs alone
will not be sufficient to manage the revenue shortfall.
It
is proposed that the Council acquire investment properties that
will facilitate a function e.g. economic development and or
generate a minimum net income of 0.5% above the prevailing gilt
rate to develop an additional revenue income stream as well as an
appreciating capital asset.
The
acquisition and purchase costs would be funded through the Public
Works Loan Board, therefore there would be no impact on the
Councils
capital programme. Any proposed acquisition would need to
meet the minimum eligibility criteria as follows:
i.
The acquisition will result in a net annual return
of 0.5% above the prevailing government gilt rate for a 20 year
investment.
ii Debt repayment has to be
completed within 20 years.
iii
Acquisitions should normally be
pre-let to a tenant with a strong covenant with a minimum of 10 years unexpired
on a commercial lease.
Member scrutiny:
- Members requested
reassurance as to why this was the best method of investment and
advised that it would have been preferred for a comparable paper to
be presented. Officers advised that the
level of yield compared to capital value and risk had been
considered in types of investment available.
- The committee were
informed that, if adopted, the asset strategy would be reviewed in
accordance and aligned with the Investment Property
Strategy. Members were
reassured that Whole Place and Town Centre Regeneration were not in
conflict.
- Further
information was requested regarding how costs had been factored and
whether maintenance charges, management costs and risks were being
neglected. Officers clarified that, an initial screen would be
undertaken and 4.5% net initial yield. Due diligence would then
follow where Maintenance costs, loan repayments and marketplace
comparisons would be taken into account. The intention is that the acquisitions would be
cost neutral and managed within existing team capacity, however
workloads and time would need to be prioritised.
- Officers
highlighted that this would be the right way to generate income for
front line delivery and each business case would be considered
individually.
- A member
questioned whether best practice or similar schemes had been
operated in other authorities and were advised that practice had
been exercised in English authorities and it was utilised to
achieve budget.
- Staff within the
department would use appropriate skills and knowledge required to
acquire relevant properties.
- A member
highlighted that the discussion through select committee had
enabled members with a fuller understanding of the purpose of the
report and was confident in the abilities of the team.
- A member expressed
concern regarding the perceived use of public money. We were
reassured that appropriate policies, legislation and code of ethics
would be adhered to.
- Members expressed
some concerns regarding the capacity to fulfil expectations
identified within the report. The
committee were reassured that initial work would be undertaken to
fill voids and would be focused on all business sectors.
- The committee
discussed whether it would be more appropriate to look at buildings
within or outside Monmouthshire.
Positive (e.g. benefits to County, alignment with corporate
strategy, Whole Place) and negative (e.g. limited property
availability) aspects were considered and we agreed that initially
the strategy should be applicable to properties within
Monmouthshire, however, this should not restrict other areas in
future.
Recommendation:
We resolved to agree recommendations within
the report:
That Scrutiny
review the proposed acquisition policy for investment properties
prior to consideration by Cabinet.
Committee’s
Conclusion:
Chair’s Summary:
The committee highlighted key information, as
follows:
·
Recommendations should include that focus should be
maintained within Monmouthshire for investment, however, would not
close to other areas.
·
Scrutiny of business cases was recognised as an
important function and should take place
·
Valuable contribution through discussion was
noted
·
Agreed that Members would receive the paper for
information, prior to it being presented to Cabinet
We thanked officers for information
presented.
|