Agenda item

Scrutiny of the School Catchment Review

Minutes:

Matt Jones, the Manager of the Access Unit presented proposals relating to primary school catchment areas and the consultation process for changing some of the catchments in Monmouthshire. He explained that the proposal was to change the catchment for Tredunnock, Llanhennock and Llandegvedd, which currently have Charles Williams Primary School in Newport as their catchment school. The consultation proposed to align these areas with Monmouthshire primary catchment and Monmouth Comprehensive School, which is their secondary catchment, so that Monmouthshire children have equal access to a Monmouthshire school.  The consultation was launched in January and closed recently, and the final decision will be made by the cabinet on the 10th of April, based on a report that will include the details of the consultation responses.  

 

Challenge:  

 

  • The ward Member stated that she was very supportive of the proposal and had been fully engaged in the work to date in drafting this report. 
  • Questions were asked around how the access unit works with the planning department to prepare and ensure sufficiency in school placements and take into account future housing projections, citing examples where housing developments have been marketed as being within the catchment of a good school, when there may not be places in the school.  
  • Members highlighted their concern in relation to Crick Road and the sufficiency, due to the 2 primaries at full capacity.  
  • Questions were asked about how many responses were received from the consultation on primary school catchment areas (the answer was 17), how many were supportive of the proposed change (13 responses were supportive), and what the main reasons were for supporting or opposing the change. The officer responded that supporters wanted equal access to a Monmouthshire school, while the opponents were concerned about distance and travel options. 
  • Members asked how the travelling distance and transport options would affect the families in the affected area and how housing developments in the area will impact the capacity of the schools.  The officer explained that the council would provide free home to school transport to the nearest or catchment school, and that parents could still choose to send their children to Charles Williams School if they preferred. He reassured Members that they had taken into account the projected numbers of children from the new developments and that Usk School had sufficient capacity to accommodate them.  
  • Questions were asked around pupil funding and where it goes if a pupil stays in an area, the officer explaining that funding is purely relevant to numbers on school roll, not per head, and that if children go to school out of county, the council doesn’t receive the pupil funding and similarly, if they come into Monmouthshire from out of county, the funding comes in with them, so it tends to neutralise.  
  • Members asked how many pupils the proposal would involve and the cost of transporting them. The officer responded that it would be 9 that would be eligible and that the projected position between now and 2027, would be 2 children per year that would need to be built into Usk’s catchment, served by an extra minibus.  
  • Questions were asked around the funding formula ratio we use, but it was explained that it is complex and could be brought to a future member workshop for discussion. is it 1.3 per household?   
  • Members asked about siblings and if there is an automatic right the sibling can go to the same school and the response was that the policy has been amended to give priority to catchment children over those who are outside of the area, even if there is a sibling link.  

 

Summary: 

 

The committee acknowledged the background, rationale and consultation process for the proposed change of catchment area for Tredunnock, Llanhennock and Llandegvedd from Charles Williams Primary School in Newport to Usk Church in Wales School in Monmouthshire. The committee had heard that most responses were supportive of the change, although some had raised concerns about distance and travel options. Members recognised that the primary school catchment areas review will be a rolling programme, looking at each area of the county and assessing their suitability and need for change. The committee asked to be involved in the process through workshops and highlighted the need for the ward member to be engaged throughout Members supported the proposals outlined in the report.