Agenda and minutes

Apologies were also received from Councillor Stevens, who was being substituted by Councillor Peter Strong. Apologies were received from Councillor Webb for the petitions agenda item, and Penny Jones confirmed she would present the petition on Councillor Webb’s behalf.  

None declared.  

Several people attended the public open forum to speak on different matters.  

Lynne Sheridan ~ Strategic Equality Plan 2024-2025 

• Lynne emphasised the importance of councils ensuring their policies and practices comply with the Equality Act 2010, especially following a recent Supreme Court judgment clarifying that "sex" refers to biological sex only. 

• She noted difficulty in accessing council policies as a member of the public and highlighted the need for greater transparency.  

• Lynne stressed that councils, as duty bearers, cannot use ignorance of the law or wait for government guidance as a defence for non-compliance. She suggested that even compliant policies can be undermined in practice, referencing evidence from tribunals and judicial reviews.   

• She referenced a recent tribunal case where an officer was unaware of workplace regulations requiring sex-based facilities, illustrating gaps in staff knowledge.  

• Lynne also described a scenario in leisure centres where staff may face challenges if users report concerns about facility use based on sex, questioning whether staff are adequately trained to handle such situations. She urged the council to review and update policies and training as necessary to ensure compliance and effective frontline response.  

Freddie Madler ~ Home to School Transport Policy 

• Freddie raised concerns about the removal of home-to-school transport for children aged 4 to 11 in Saint Arvans, highlighting significant emotional, physical, and financial impacts on families.  

• She stated that the new walking route exceeds 55 minutes each way, is unlit, overgrown, frequently flooded, and includes an unsafe crossing, making it unsuitable and unsafe for young children, especially in winter.  

• Freddie also stated that the route exceeds the 45-minute maximum recommended for primary children and has not been independently assessed as required by statutory guidance.  

• She argued that the policy shifts the burden onto families, disproportionately affects working households, and creates postcode-based inequality, as some children are excluded despite the bus passing their previous stop.  

• Freddie spoke of how long, demanding journeys negatively affect children's readiness to learn, causing tiredness, cold, and anxiety, which undermines educational and well-being goals.  

• Freddie suggested the decision contradicts the council's climate and active travel objectives by increasing car use and emissions and urged the council to review and reinstate transport to ensure equity, safety, and policy coherence.  

Community Councillor Matt Sidwell ~ Home to School Transport Policy 

• Councillor Sidwell mentioned that an appeal (Stage 1) has been lodged regarding the removal of free home-to-school transport for Mathern and Pwlmeyric, and they are awaiting a response.  

• He highlighted that while the council may not have a legal obligation under the Climate Change Act, it must demonstrate consideration of climate impacts, questioning how the council will address increased car journeys and associated CO2 emissions compared to bus transport.  

• He referenced a previous ruling in 2023 that deemed the route unsafe, particularly at the A48 and Pwllmeyric Hill area, and noted that no changes have been made since, questioning the justification for removing the bus service.  

Peter Farley, Chair of St. Arvans Community Council ~ Home to School Transport  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.

St Arvan’s Petition  

Councillor Penny Jones presented the petition from St Arvans ward on the Home to School Transport Policy, on behalf of Councillor Ann Webb. In reading the wording of the petition, Councillor Jones explained that the petition called for the Council to: 

“Reinstate the fully funded home-school-transport for all the primary aged children who attend The Dell School in St Arvan’s. The speed and volume of traffic which the children will be exposed to is a risk, the road crossing is not safe, and the footpath is hazardous.  

Children attending The Dell School from the age of 4 are expected to walk up to 2 miles each way. The emotional and physical stress of this walk, in all weathers, will negatively impact their mental health, physical health and ability to effectively engage with their learning when in school.  

There are major safety concerns from the children and parents around the safety of the road crossing and footpath, they are expected to walk. The crossing is not suitably lit and wide enough. The path is unlit, uneven and extremely narrow in parts with the close proximity to a high number of cars. In the case of an emergency there is a section of the footpath, which is obscured from view, from the road with no easy way to access it, if needed. The children and parents have safety concerns with regards to walking past the racecourse on race day and the days following”. 

Mathern Petition  

Councillor Lousie Brown presented the petition from Mathern ward on the Home to School Transport Policy. In reading the wording of the petition, Councillor Brown explained that the petition called for the Council to: 

“Retain free home to school transport to the Dell Primary School and to the Chepstow Comprehensive School for the pupils from the Mathern Community Council Area (Mathern, Mounton, Pwllmeyric Hill & Haysgate), as the route to school is unsafe and hazardous, as evidenced by the double white lines from Parkwall roundabout to Highbeech Roundabout.  There is no safe crossing point for pupils to cross the main A48. The volume and speed of traffic on the A48 are a risk. There is insufficient width to the footpaths to walk safely from Mathern to both schools.  

Expecting children from as young as 4 years old to walk up to 2 miles each way daily to The Dell Primary School and for children of 11 years old to walk up to 3 miles each way daily to the Chepstow Comprehensive School in all weathers, carrying school equipment and study material, not allowed to wear outer clothing and storing it to dry during the day at school is not safe, it is emotionally stressful, effects their mental and physical health due to effects of weather and walking in close proximity to a major traffic route, and is a major concern for the parents of said children to ensure they are safe at all times”. 

Councillor Brown also highlighted that the petition had received 222 signatures  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

Scrutiny of the county of sanctuary strategy, which promotes inclusion and welcome across the wider community.

Councillor Sandles introduced the report, highting that Monmouthshire is committed to welcoming refugees and becoming an accredited council of sanctuary, while also engaging with local sanctuary organizations and supporting inclusive communities. Sharran Lloyd delivered a presentation before taking Member’s questions. 

Key Questions from Members: 

• How do we prevent the County of Sanctuary award from becoming a gimmick, and what will the Council's role be after receiving the award? Will there be designated staff or budget, and how will performance be measured? Will other groups like charities, businesses, and sports clubs be involved? 
   

Officers responded that the aim is to embed the principles in Council practice and culture, with staff training and awareness. Performance monitoring is not fully developed yet but is under consideration. Other agencies, including schools and voluntary groups, can apply for sanctuary status, and the Council is working with schools and education colleagues on this.  

• Does the Council have anyone supporting women who need antenatal and postnatal services but are afraid to come forward due to their immigration status (no recourse to public funds)? 

Officers confirmed that the Council is developing a pathway for those with no recourse to public funds, ensuring a human response so no one is left destitute, and staff know how to support such cases.  

• What is the Council's actual role in becoming a county of sanctuary, and does it involve much new work given existing legislation and community efforts? 

In response, another Member suggested the Council's role is to ensure people seeking sanctuary are treated with dignity and respect, helping them integrate, rather than change government migration policy. This response was supported by officers. 

• A member emphasised the importance of promoting good relations between groups to ensure vibrant and cohesive communities, especially given the potential for political tension and negative media attention around refugee housing. They stressed the need for urgent community engagement in Portskewett to address concerns and achieve positive outcomes, considering local housing pressures and the broader context of seeking county of sanctuary status.  

Officers responded by acknowledging the concerns about housing suitability for refugees, stating that any property considered for nomination will be actively reviewed, taking into account factors like rurality, transport, and access to services, regardless of background. They assured that all relevant factors will be considered in the decision-making process for housing allocation.  

• Please could "conflict" be added to the list of reasons for improved outcomes for groups who have fled persecution, specifically referencing the importance of including conflict alongside sexual orientation and religious beliefs.  

• How many Ukrainian families are still in Monmouthshire? 

Officers answered that there are about 50 families living with hosts, and a total of 350 Ukrainians have come to Monmouthshire under the Homes for Ukraine scheme, with some having found work and housing locally. Monmouthshire has more Ukrainian arrivals than any other part of Wales relative to its size, and that the long-term future for these families depends on the situation in Ukraine, but for now, they are contributing to the local community.  

They  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

To scrutinise the council’s progress in delivering the Strategic Equality Objectives for the year 2024-2025.

Cabinet Member Councillor Angela Sandles introduced the report, explaining that the Equality Act 2010 requires the council to produce a strategic equality plan and annual progress reports. She advised that the current plan covered 2024–2028 and aligned with the council’s corporate and community goals. Together with Pennie Walker, she answered Members’ questions. 

Key Questions and points raised by Members: 

• How is the council is giving every child the best start in life when the home to school transport policy adds barriers to school attendance, especially for pre-school meal children who already have lower attendance rates? I’m concerned that the council is waiting to see the impact on children receiving free school meals, rather than proactively addressing potential barriers. 

• How the council can further include young people just above the free school meal eligibility line, who are disadvantaged by the £2 daily charge for breakfast at King Henry School and may not be able to afford it?  

• Is the council is liaising with the Women’s Institute in Gwent regarding their "knot in my name" campaign against violence towards women and girls? 

• Are there are plans to review drop kerbs at bus stops across the county, noting that while improvements have been made in some areas, issues remain elsewhere? 

• Are we planning to extend digital literacy training beyond hubs to secondary settlements and the wider community, to reach those with ongoing digital needs? 

Pennie advised that due to the specific nature of the questions asked that relate to responsibilities of various service areas, she would need to seek answers to provide to the committee by email (Action: Pennie Walker). 

• The protected characteristics under the Equality Act need updating. The plan should use "sex" (biological sex) instead of "gender" in line with the Supreme Court judgement, especially when referencing the Equality Act.  

• The Welsh Government's LGBTQ+ action plan referenced in the report is also not in keeping with legislation, following the Supreme Court judgement. Policies should ensure compliance, especially regarding the legal status of trans and non-binary identities. Policies should ensure compliance, especially regarding the legal status of trans and non-binary identities. 

Pennie advised that the our Strategic Equality Plan reflects the position for 2024-2025 which was prior to the Supreme Court Judgement, so the plan was drafted correctly for the time period it reflects.  

• Inclusive language" should mean avoiding inappropriate gendered terms (e.g., using "chair" instead of "chairman"). 

Penny acknowledged this and agreed to review and update the language in the plan (Action: Pennie Walker). 

• Sex as a characteristic should be included in "give every child the best start in life," particularly in relation to LGBTQ+ education, as the Equality Act is about sex and gender reassignment, not gender ideology. I have concerns about puberty blockers and safeguarding children.  

• Why is sex not listed as a relevant characteristic in Objective 1, highlighting its importance for inclusion, menstruation, and health issues?  

• Please can we remove the tick for gender reassignment, as it is not applicable to children.  

Penny agreed this  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

To present the finding of the Adult Services Inspection.

Jenny Jenkins presented the adult services inspection report, noting it followed up on 2022 findings around people, prevention, well-being, and partnership. Of 23 areas for improvement, 20 have been completed; work continues on risk management, contingency planning, and carers' co-production. Ongoing efforts include quality assurance, training, and revising carers' assessments. Inspectors gave positive feedback on transformation plans, service expansion, technology use, and safeguarding. The service is satisfied with progress but remains committed to further improvement and ongoing engagement with Care Inspectorate Wales. 

Together with Cabinet Member Councillor Ian Chandler and Jane Rodgers, Jenny answered Members’ questions.  

Key Questions from Members: 

• Are statutory reviews that are not ‘being undertaken in a timely manner’, due to staff shortages or other reasons? 

Jenny Jenkins advised that the main reason is the volume of work, which impacts the ability to conduct reviews on time. She added that improvements are being made through better recording and additional resources, resulting in above-average performance in review completion. The Welsh average for completed reviews is 60%, while Monmouthshire achieved 70% at the end of the year, indicating substantial improvement.  

• The 64% staff recommendation rate for working at Monmouthshire seems a low figure which is concerning.  

Jane explained that 64% is not as high as desired, reflecting the challenging environment in adult social care, especially post-COVID and during ongoing changes. She stated that efforts are being made to improve staff engagement and communication.  

• In terms of the progress of the domiciliary care change, there are concerns about the transfers from providers and new carers and whether the planned changeover date is still achievable.  

Jane advised that in terms of the timescale, the three lot areas are in different positions, with one ready to go and two requiring more attention, but overall, the plan is broadly on track and the main priority is ensuring continuity of care. She encouraged anyone with concerns to contact the council directly.  

• Section 2.8 of the report refers to people who are paying privately not being offered assessments, and from my own experience, I know that lacking access to assessment reports when holding power of attorney can make people feel vulnerable. It’s important to address this concern as it has also been highlighted by Care Inspectorate Wales.  

Jane explained that while many people arrange care without council involvement, if someone comes to the council with care and support needs, they will be offered an assessment and support. Jenny added that the process includes discussing how care is to be provided, but acknowledged the process can be complex.  

• Are there many elderly people living alone who "fall through the net", who do not receive help, because no one realizes they need it or they are unsure who to ask? 

Jane advised that this is always a concern and efforts to strengthen early help approaches in communities are very important, relying on partnerships with third sector organizations, community groups, and health partners to identify those in need. She emphasized the importance of community networks, neighbours and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

Noted.

Noted, Councillor Howarth highlighting the need for the planner to be updated to avoid potential calling-in of decisions. 

This was deferred to the next meeting.

Planners noted, raise with SLT about embargoes ICMD. 

30th September 2025.